AI or 'Artificial intelligence' has different meanings. It can mean...
1) Software that mimics 'human' responses, like Cortana. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortana
2) Software that adapts by itself based on input.
3) Software that reflects more intelligence than was used to create it.
or it can mean other things https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence
On this website, AI usually refers to a network generated intelligence. Similar to the 'intelligence' of software combined realtime with human input, and using network dynamics to 'harvest' the 'intelligence' product i.e., scientific steps that would be more difficult to reach through other means.
~
AI networks will be digital currency networks that have large numbers of people, on two or more competing sides, which develop algorithms to solve progressively more complex problems. The process is the same as any scientific work, except it is accelerated by organizing software and 'scientists' or 'human input workers'.
~
Melting pot societies have been consolidating some sciences and eliminating others, which is what melting pots do.
One thing that will become clear as artificial intelligence develops is that there is an overwhelming advantage individuals raised in a more "indigenous" environment have in understanding useful "artificial intelligence".
Part of the reason for this is that the strength of 'artificial intelligence' in the near future will be based on the 'differentness' of their component networks. Two allied networks with different languages, cultures etc will be much faster at developing ai than two related groups. More basically though, a consolidated tribal group has a more accurate perception of 'intelligence'. Their rationality may not end at the same place as melting pot rationality but it has a tested foundation. The perception of intelligence in a melting pot is opportunistic, while tribal perceptions of intelligence are not colored by individual motives.
Society, globally, is a conglomeration of powerful melting pots, at the moment. A few isolated indigenous groups in some places have a small amount of power but most indigenous people the world over are simply trying to avoid being totally consumed by one or another melting pot.
Things have gotten to the point where most melting potters superficially consider themselves "indigenous" to their melting pot, as long as they are in the company of enough compatriots.
The "American" feels threatened by Native "outsiders". The "Chinese", the "Indian", the "Brazilian", the "Indonesian", likewise. They all consider themselves traditional old cultures who have custody of childlike indigenous people, who are a burden to them, rather than the other way around.
~
~In Progress
It has been going on this way for a long time.
"Nevertheless, details of how the Pythia operated are missing as authors from the classical period (6th to 4th centuries BC) treat the process as common knowledge with no need to explain."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythia
~