Uncategorised
"The researchers involved in Unit 731 were secretly given immunity by the United States in exchange for the data they gathered through human experimentation."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731
https://allthatsinteresting.com/unit-731
~
This page will look at the way Japan reacted to the post WW2 world, which resulted in the conquerors imposing a foreign worldview on some of their people, and the significance of their current return to a 'new' nationalist path.
The argument is framed alongside a more detailed discussion of the 'Western' effort to hijack psychology by enforcing public stupidity regarding certain things, including lithium.
Some background is on the Colonial Psychiatry page and the links at the bottom of this page.
~
Some essential concepts are numbered first so they can be referred to briefly e.g. 'see item 1', and also to provide some context.
1) The Japanese, and most island populations around the world, have historically a frontier mentality. They are generally willing to take bigger chances, pay bigger prices etc than continental groups. They also have consequently developed certain recovery paths, ways to regroup their tradition after setbacks, that are not easily recognizable by outsiders. Aspects of 'the frontier mentality' as it applies to Japan can be inferred from Jung's study of Temenos and other sources.
2) The ongoing rapid decline of Britain is connected to the resurgence of Japan, not in a causative way, but each is the most highly 'internationalized' Western and Eastern frontier power respectively. The shift from 'West to East' is most easily viewed looking at Britain's decline and Japan's new rise. Both have basic powerful sections of society which strongly seek return to something represented by a monarchy https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-real-face-of-the-european-union/ but Japan is in a better position to have a positive outcome from that influence.
3) There is abundant evidence that the shift from analytical psychology to pharmacological psychiatry was part of a broader project which has not yet been made public. Although many related programs have been exposed, such as the MK programs, these have been presented to the public as local or 'tactical' projects, MKUltra supposedly was intended to assist with local interrogations for example. Unpublicized so far, but clearly a major factor in the post WW2 world at a strategic level, was this shift away from analytical psychology, which allowed globalization to occur in a certain way, and which was the result of efforts by the same group of people involved in the MK projects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
https://www.history.com/mkultra-operation-midnight-climax-cia-lsd-experiments
https://smile.amazon.com/General-Reinhard-Gehlen-CIA-Connection/dp/0913969303/
4) A person should first have some sense of the German concept of Weltanschauungskrieg to understand this immense psywar undertaken using pharmaceutical psychiatry by the 'allies' post WW2, and how its effects were meant to influence countries like Japan.
https://cognitive-liberty.online/psychological-warfare-weltanschauungskrieg-the-war-of-worldview/
https://archives.globalresearch.ca/articles/SIM311A.html
5) In German it is common to form compound words to create a new concept, and Weltanschauungskrieg is an example of that. New concepts or words always have an implicit question about their etymology or origin. When you hear a new word, and somebody explains the meaning, there is some curiosity, whether conscious or not, as to the concepts origin. This German tendency adds some 'instant history and credibility' to the concept regardless its meaning or what a person may believe about it. So, whereas in German the phrase is helpful to anybody interested in understanding it, English variations are generally not.
6) After WW2 the 'allies', notably Britain, the U.S. and Australia, started a longterm Weltanschaungskrieg operation, along the lines of what the Nazis had been doing. Again, a person must have some understanding of the term to see what was being done, and still is being done.
7) In Japan the concept of 'hikikomori' is seen from two distinct angles. Older people who are part of Japan's martial tradition will instinctively recognize it as a necessary regrouping of a part of society. Outsiders will see it as a phenomenon similar to various less common tendencies in other countries e.g. hermits, cat ladies etc. Those who recognize it as 'something else' will refer to it as 'a distinctly Japanese phenomenon', as is done for example in https://www.documentarystorm.com/japan-the-mystery-of-the-missing-million/ British people who are aware of both the ongoing 'world view war' involving analytical psychology vs pharma psychiatry will of course be most unsettled by the Japanese regrouping, as a person can see from that video. Note that at the end of the video the British reporter pays polite respect to traditional natural ways people regroup. He does not wish the Japanese well, clearly, but his education is good enough that he follows basic rules of civilized conduct.
8) Note in the documentary https://youtu.be/JCySrIW-wWw that the speaker is deviously trying to create a history of therapeutic oral lithium. Lithium has been used as a salt in bathing water for thousands of years, long before it was known as an element. During the 19th century there were many snake oil salesmen who were like semi doctors. You can pick literally any chemical available in the 19th century and find 'doctors' who tried to sell it as a cure for something. The hijacking of lithium, its promotion as an oral medication to give instant credibility to pharma psychiatry, included conjuring a pseudo history for oral lithium while suppressing lithium's real medicinal use i.e., topical or in bathing water. It was a clever maneuver at the time, hijacking the nutrient lithium, but the perpetrators did not anticipate the internet and the erosion of the power of Britain's former colonies on developing nations.
Imagine if they had also chosen to hijack Vitamin B12, which was not isolated until 1948. Pharmapsychiatry would then have two substances which, if controlled, could induce 'mental illness' in most of the population. Of course that would further give credibility to the highly profitable bizarre designer molecules used to hide 'mental health' symptoms and empower pharmapsychiatrists as global arbiters of mental health.
It's important to recognize that the speaker in that video was not part of the project. He is an example of the second stage or step in developing a world view war. A credible expert who had some vulnerability or need which the Weltanschauungskrieg designers could control. Jung would have recognized his weakness, his malleability, but of course the whole point of the project was to steer people away from analytical psychology, to make Jung's opinions, for example, irrelevant. That professor got academic power, authority, and other unknown perks for joining a group who he trusted as genuine scientists. If he had lived long enough he would have renounced the people who used him to divert psychology.
Notice also in that video, the reference at about 32 minutes to the use of lithium salt as a substitute for sodium chloride in high blood pressure. See links below. Lithium has a long and important history, as a nutrient absorbed through the skin at lithium springs for example. The oral use of lithium for anything is silly and begs examination.
9) The deliberate misdirection of lithium research towards 'psychiatric' oral lithium use has had a vast negative effect on many lives.
Speculation / The evidence seems to indicate that long term lithium deficiency has lasting effects like any long term mineral deficiency. The long term lack of any nutrient will leave behind some organic damage at some point. The restriction of lithium to oral prescriptions by psychiatrists, in other words forcing a population susceptible to lithium deficiency to only consume a toxic form, and suppressing the use of lithium baths, has almost certainly increased the number of 'lithium deficient syndrome people', which is the proper term for many 'mentally ill' people. In other words many people classified as 'mentally ill' are simply showing the long term effects, in some cases irreversible, of lithium deficiency in their previous years.
There is very strong anecdotal evidence for this. People who have been prescribed lithium fall into two broad categories, a) those who recoil at the toxic effects, or otherwise do not notice a change, and b) those who consider it a very effective 'medicine'. The latter group generally are 'healthier' and appear as having less 'organic' evidence of 'mental illness'.
Simply doing proper research on lithium, something impossible currently because of the 'political correctness' in academic research, would have a major effect on millions of people.
Most people avoid wondering if they need lithium because it is portrayed as a psychiatric drug rather than as an essential element like calcium, magnesium, potassium etc.
This is an example of a line of study which simple facts encourage, but which the pharma psych mentality prevents. A successful study of those two categories of 'mentally ill' would directly contradict one of the basic tenets of pharma psychiatry, and very few researchers can bring themselves to contemplate pharma psychiatry as a deliberate massive mistake, much less experiment in that direction.
10)
~
~
https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/why-big-oil-conquered-world/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3712976/ and by the same author, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31144519/ and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12799742/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCySrIW-wWw
https://inhn.org/fileadmin/archives_new/Gershon/Gershon_s_CV.pdf
https://www.documentarystorm.com/japan-the-mystery-of-the-missing-million/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14881840/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13425957/
https://inhn.org/profiles/edward-trautner.html
A long documentary that gives some interesting facts https://www.documentarystorm.com/counter-intelligence-shining-a-light-on-black-operations/
Another long documentary with relevant interviews, including Noam Chomsky https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/power-principle/ There are at least two sides to every issue, but most U.S. citizens are not aware of any of them.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/554542
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18117430/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12350287/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_chloride
Bohr and Einstein had two perspectives or worldviews, closely related but differing in some small areas.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-03793-2
If one of the two of them had been much more powerful than the other, the more powerful would have eliminated his opponent, and physics would have hardforked, with the less powerful view being not just suppressed, but negated, made untrue in the 'common' worldview.
At that point every interpretation made by the 'winner' would have a ~50% greater chance of being skewed away from any 'original' reality relative to the system which had two views. It would still be a productive science, but it would have objective internal contradictions ~50% more frequently and those would be detected less easily, or after a longer while.
Just as physics reflects a constructed worldview, and the main goal of any individual physicist is to validate his or her own history or perceptions, so too does politics or nationalism reflect constructed worldviews which are neither entirely true nor entirely untrue. The big difference between physicists and nationalists is generally just in their education.
~
This page, and sub pages, will have links to websites discussing a post WW2 project meant to prevent indigenous interests around the world from threatening the global colonialist power structure.
MKUltra https://www.mcgilltribune.com/mind-control-mcgill-mk-ultra/ is widely considered the prototype of 'mind control' type projects, but the evidence suggests that there was a much bigger project, a real Weltanschauungskrieg project, whose existence was kept secret by 'exposing' MKUltra. In other words MKUltra and similar projects were bones thrown to the public so that the public would believe a certain class of project had been exposed.
The real project, despite overwhelming evidence of its existence, has not been exposed yet.
https://cognitive-liberty.online/psychological-warfare-weltanschauungskrieg-the-war-of-worldview/ This page gives a very low level definition, not exactly what is being referred to on this page. There is little or no information online about how a group can use worldview manipulation strategically, something the Nazi's mastered locally, and which was then adapted by their western 'foes'.
Many people have difficulty perceiving certain classes of worldview. This lets one group's actions with regard to worldview manipulation go under the radar of another group https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3127830/uk-provides-model-handling-racial-inquality-government-report It is important to know that any group will initiate hostile 'worldview' projects once they are cognizant of such projects directed against them, and that Western Europe, particularly Britain, is especially vulnerable to such retribution.
1) Capitalism vs Communism?
Perhaps one of the most significant example of Weltanschauungskrieg is the framing of the global landscape as being 'capitalism vs communism' when in fact capitalism and communism are on the same side, opposing sovereign indigenous development around the world.
Reframing the world's development this way allowed developing countries to cooperate in the extermination of indigenous groups and interests, while appearing to fight one another. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1406941?seq=1
An interesting, and odd, example of something similar is in the article https://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/eu-diplomat-josep-borrell-i-should-have-indulged-my-desire-to-argue-a-little-more-a-536b51ee-d687-4e05-b7af-e57a35c1249f
"DER SPIEGEL: You are a Catalan, but you reject the region’s independence from Spain. Lavrov identified that as a weakness."
The article seems out of character for Der Spiegel, but it shows the way people and groups are manipulated by 'bigger worldviews' which aren't really bigger. In this case the Russians 'retreated' to common sense and the 'European' did not want to follow.
2) The U.S. vs Europe
It has always been in the U.S.'s interests to have a weaker Europe. Noam Chomsky explains this a bit in this documentary http://uselesseaterblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/power-principe-iii-apocalypse.html The big winner from WW2 was The U.S., not any other country.
The UK of course consists of genetic descendants of various European groups, Basques for example, and the U.S. is similarly descendant of the UK in terms of Worldview as well as a significant part of its population.
Europe has realized, too late probably, that the survival of their individual groups, nations, is at odds with the survival of those descendants of Britain which exist within the British bubble or Weltanschauung i.e., Australia, the U.S. etc.
Europe is consolidating from East to West as Asia grows stronger, and its possible or likely this consolidation may never reach Western Europe. The so called 'European Union' is a clever 'fake it til you make it' attempt to do an end run around this trend, an attempt to impose a synthetic unity that might have existed naturally in a different world, and hope that it holds up.
The British are caught between their history and their remaining aspirations. They seem to be betting heavily on their 'union' with the U.S., Australia etc, and the preservation of the Weltanschauung which was cleverly globalized.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
The famous British motto 'Who dares wins' has become a sort of anchor wrapped around them. Britain, like all countries, is a great nation with a cloudy history. To pull off their 'who dares wins' today would require simply adapting to the times, global reality, but they have such a history of imposing themselves on other societies that they probably will not 'dare' to adapt sufficiently quickly.
As with the United States, Britain has a very rough path ahead. A vigorous global lockdown is one possible way for them to cheat death for a few decades, and undo much of what threatens them, if their actions lead to an increase in tribal sovereignty.
~
To this day there are hundreds of thousands of people, employed by various governments, whose job is to maintain false worldviews and reduce the influence of those who challenge them. The United States, for example, has a sizeable 'psy war' project which trains young people to believe the derivatives of false sciences. The young people involved are taught to believe they are using deception to promote the truth, a silliness that can only be maintained in a coercive environment like the military.
"The command originated in 1950, when the U.S. Army developed the Psychological Warfare (PSYWAR) Division of the Army General School at Fort Riley, Kansas. The U.S. Army Psychological Warfare Center and School, which included operational tactical units and a school under the same umbrella, moved to Fort Bragg in 1952. The center was proposed by the Army's then-Psychological Warfare Chief, Robert A. McClure, to provide doctrinal support and training for both psychological and unconventional warfare. In 1956, the PSYWAR Center and School was renamed the U.S. Army Center for Special Warfare/U.S. Army Special Warfare School. The school was tasked with developing the doctrine, techniques, training, and education of Special Forces and Psychological Operations personnel."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_Special_Warfare_Center_and_School
The cognitive progression used on trainees is a lot like that in any gang. First they are taught that the main part of their work involves doing 'x' small bad act to promote 'y' good outcome. Then they are gradually walked into their real purpose, which they have been conditioned to ignore, to not see.
Any melting pot country which is trying to consume indigenous and foreign peoples will have some variation of this type of project. It is not unique to the U.S., but the U.S. is by far the most aggressive consumer of conquered cultures and so is also the biggest market for propagandists. When the Soviets were in their expansionist phase they briefly probably surpassed the U.S. in legitimizing worldview deceit as policy at a very local level. An important historical difference is that the core culture of the Soviet empire, Russia, was a largely consolidated, established nation, and so was able to 'retreat to its own territory' as its ambitions failed. The U.S. has no such legitimacy as a nation, no place to retreat to as it decays, and the biggest strategic concern for other countries is the defensive reaction of the 'ruling' part of the United States as it enters its death throes.
Of course the public position of the United States is that it is a legitimate nation, but the nations it conquered are not, and of course the U.S. 'worldview' is based on expanding, or providing a protective layer for, the British or Western European presence in frontier indigenous territories.
Note that as the inaccurate worldview decays it becomes more and more necessary to enforce it locally. This was a key in the Western success in dismantling the Soviet Union, and it is a key in the current deterioration of the United States into the 'new' Soviet Union. So as the imposed worldview loses ground to simple truth, countries like the United States are forced more and more to employ their 'psywar' tools domestically, until a critical threshold is reached at which point almost anybody is able to counter the entire agenda of that psywar with very little effort, and heavy police action becomes a constant necessity.
Unfortunately the U.S. has a vast domestic police force with a lot of expensive tools, so the decay is likely to be messy.
3) Here is a very local example of a worldview conflict between a couple who have a small child https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vgtde4vk9jc
a) It starts with some sort of argument between the two parents. At this point 3 people involved, two parents and a baby. A pretty common scenario, one of the parents takes the baby so now that parent is 'two' against one.
b) The 'one', outgunned, enlists family to join the conflict. Now there are several against two.
c) Next, some of the family, in this case a brother of the mother, go to the territory of the father, who is holding the child, and try to provoke him by hanging wanted posters around his house.
d) Now there are perhaps dozens of police involved from two countries. Eventually simultaneous raids on numerous houses, etc.
This is a simple dispute between two people who probably should have waited til adulthood to have children. There was never any real danger to the child, despite some fiction about a potentially deadly intolerance for baby formula. So one of the couple assembled a crew to alter the perception of the situation by provoking the other. Then police got involved, and of course their job is largely creating criminals, so what started as a private dispute is now official.
Should a parent kidnap a child to 'win' an argument, or whatever the motive? Of course not. She got married because she saw dollar signs. He got married because she is very attractive. Both are made for each other, neither is dangerous to anybody, including the child. But now there is a long tv show that 'proves' a small sliver of the worldview of one person inaccurately, at the expense of the other.
Ultimately the 'victim' parent kidnaps the baby from the 'kidnapper' parent, with probably dozens of people involved in one way or another. A small child is obviously best with its mother, but nobody benefited in this case, including the child.
4) This is a very 'local' or low level example of manipulating worldview, but it is widespread across melting pots.
Police announce they are vacating drug convictions because a cop lied about some arrests.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/50-drug-convictions-vacated-nypd-cop-accused-perjury/story?id=76926057
A previous article on that cop tries to imply that officials investigated themselves and found the misconduct.
"The review of Detective Franco’s cases began last summer, when the district attorney’s staff noticed major inconsistencies in the detective’s statements and the underpinning evidence in his casework, Mr. Henry said."
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/24/nyregion/nyc-detective-perjury-franco.html
But there are more holes in the police version than a person can easily keep track of.
A prosecution obviously cannot be based on one cop, by him or her self, claiming to have seen a drug transaction. All cops work in groups, but drug cops much more than other cops.
The fact that at least two of the fictional drug deals led to guilty pleas suggests that there was more fabricated evidence than the NYT has reported.
That particular guy has been a cop since 2000 and his salary has been above $100,000 since 2016, not counting the benefits package NYPD provides, which is worth roughly as much as the salary at times.
https://www.capstat.nyc/officer/p34843/
Obviously he worked with a lot of corrupt cops, and he was the one least prepared for the eventuality of a scandal.
How many corrupt cops is his prosecution covering up?
The clear goal in pursuing this corrupt cop is to promote the view that corrupt cops are rooted out. 50 or a hundred years ago most people would have believed that. Today, many younger people might try, or want, to believe that police are rooting out corruption when they arrest a single drug detective, but very few older people believe that. If you polled 5000 people in NY about whether the corrupt cop in this case was being crooked on his own, less than 5% of those over 30 would say he was.
~
One practical aspect of understanding how worldviews develop might be in space travel.
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-forgotten-mystery-of-inertia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach%27s_principle
https://owlcation.com/stem/What-is-the-Mass-Effect-Gravity-Assist-or-MEGA-Drive
People construct a lot of small local things out of their worldview, like physics, then make those small things big.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_relativity
https://www.britannica.com/science/equivalence-principle
There may be many 'blatantly obvious' things which are invisible to a person because of their 'frame of reference'.
This can be easily shown in a lot of 'trivial' matters, but if it is true for 'big' things like physics then 'physics' is much bigger than anybody can imagine.
In Progress
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinhard_Gehlen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehlen_Organization
https://allthatsinteresting.com/reinhard-gehlen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Psychiatric_Association
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Federation_for_Mental_Health
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Ritter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%BCdin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_M%C3%BCckter
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Bertha
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Villinger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Mauz
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hephata_(Schwalmstadt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ewen_Cameron
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Ambros
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/operation-paperclip
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lieb
https://archives.globalresearch.ca/articles/SIM311A.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4-B_2OfgUA
Every group of people should have a territory of some sort where they can develop without being forced to be the long term underclass to a conquering race.
~
A list of some tragedies unique to melting pots.
1) The melting pot Native.
The goal of the melting pot is to absorb and assimilate conquered indigenous societies, and create a 'sub class' of new people who are longterm subordinate to the 'ruling race'. No matter how many generations pass the conquered groups never actually attain equality until they disappear, aside from some token members who 'sufficiently surrender' and are rewarded with high paying or prominent jobs.
Note that when a person from the underclass groups finally reaches the pinnacle, Barrack Obama is an example, the pinnacle has shifted. Obama knew exactly how far he could step, and never dared venture past his leash's reach. The presidency he held was quite different in power than that of previous presidents. A person could say Obama paved the way for Trump, and they both paved the way for Biden, a mainstream politician who is likely to end his career in some kind of discrediting or disgrace to cement the 'new' president's role.
Of course conquered people are endlessly assured that equality is just around the corner, they only need to cooperate and surrender just a little more.
Watching people conquered by 'Christian' countries trying to follow Christianity is a terrible thing. In the United States those Natives who come from areas where the worst abuses occurred are sometimes more 'Christian' than the Christians, a mixture of irony and tragedy.
Important also to know that after a group is fully assimilated, has disappeared as a visible race, the subordinate nature of the group to their conquerors is still perceivable to those conquerors. This is a fact that has only become visible in recent history, but it proves the basic importance of sovereign tribal territories. No matter how much a melting pot may promise equality etc to its victims, that equality will never arrive in reality, even long after the group 'disappears'.
2) The 'dead liver'.
Most people, including in developed countries, have seen people with a bad liver and recognize what it looks like, yellow eyes, etc. But there is a further step in that type of illness which is associated strictly with melting pot scenarios. An unusual physical condition unique to the melting pot.
a) Several anecdotal examples will be given, but one way to see if you are already aware of this illness is to look at videos and photos of Barack Obama in various circumstances, such as 39 minutes 21 seconds on the video at http://uselesseaterblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/power-principe-iii-apocalypse.html Do you see anything about him which suggests a mild illness involving the liver, not visible in the eye color, but which is not evident in some other videos of him?
b) I've seen maybe five or six people with a severe example of this condition in my life. Once in the 1990s I went to a hotel in a city where I had been before. The train arrived very late at night, so I went to a hotel I knew and knocked until somebody woke up. It was the tourist season and they were full, but they said next door probably had rooms. Next door, a new guest house, I knocked again until somebody answered. When the owner answered I sort of stepped back. I felt like I was near a dead body, somebody whose liver had completely failed. The man looked like he had a new strain of hepatitis much worse than any other. Talking with him was difficult, but eventually he told me that he had been a member of the local religion, in another city, when a group of Christians said they would buy a guesthouse or hotel for him if he converted to Christianity.
At that point I still hadn't figured out what was going on with his liver.
c) Another example I saw in a jail. I had been arrested for something during a manic episode, and was eventually shuffled from nut house to jail. When I got to the jail the administration 'lost' my medication. A lot of countries do this to mentally ill people in jail, it's been done to me in Israel and the U.S., but it is common everywhere. After a few days without medication I was put in a cell with a person very similar to the previous example. He had the color and slowness of extreme liver disease, like hepatitis but without yellow eyes, and he looked sort of like an animated dead body. In this case I had been alerted several times that I would be housed in a cell with somebody who would try to create some kind of case against me. I was never entirely sure what I had been arrested for, aside from making hostile comments about police, but he immediately tried to dissuade me from talking about mental illness by saying he didn't like crazy people and he hoped I wasn't crazy. Then he went off on some odd tangents about how he disliked police, trying to encourage me to say the same things he was saying. I knew he was a cop of course, I had been told again and again that a cop of some sort was going to be put in the cell with me, so I had no idea what exactly I was supposed to say. My main concern was simply that whatever he had might be contagious.
At this point I had figured out that the 'dead liver' syndrome was associated with coercion. Both the hotel owner and the jailhouse cop had been coerced by their respective authorities in such a way that somehow a syndrome or disease involving the liver was triggered, but I hadn't figured out more than that. The first example of the 'dead liver' that I ever recall seeing occurred before the two examples given. By going over that, much more tragic, example, I figured out a little more.
d)
3) 'This time is different'
People are famously hesitant to learn from the past, but seeing indigenous or pseudo indigenous people say "this time is different" or "the melting pot is a friend" is a bizarre tragedy. Like a fish that has watched other fish disappear after biting a lure, but still thinks metal lures might be nutritious.
One interesting thing about the 'this time is different' tragedy is that it has dna footprints, as described on the marsupial theory page, and allows a person to uncover part of a person's genetic heritage by their position. A male indigenous person with no colonist lineage among male ancestors is at one end of the spectrum. Next, a male with a maternal grandfather of colonist origin then paternal grandfather and so on.
This seems arcane to people who have no understanding of worldview, and that by itself shows the vulnerability of the current 'British' worldview which has been globalized.
In Progress
White van people, and their secrecy, are a part of industrial conditioning, colonial training.
The Gilgo Beach murders are a string of unsolved murders in which the bodies were found in one small area of Long Island.
It's often theorized the Gilgo killer or killers may be a cop or group of cops.
Around the same time those bodies were found, a group of bodies in Atlantic City was found and connected to the Gilgo murders.
https://pix11.com/news/from-gilgo-beach-to-atlantic-city-a-serial-killer-by-the-sea/
Witnesses said a white van may have been involved in the murders, but media knows to downplay that, since white vans are associated with law enforcement.
"The hotel managers said that the man they described had spent time with a man from the area who is believed to drive a white van, the type of vehicle some prostitutes on Pacific Avenue say might have been involved in the killings."
https://web.archive.org/web/20130720221800/https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/14/nyregion/14slay.html
~
When an individual has control fantasies it usually isn't that big a deal.
But when a group of individuals with control fantasies run the law enforcement apparatus of a country, and spend billions of dollars of public money enforcing their fantasies on a captive public, it is a big deal.
What kind of a person specifically wants to drive a white van? Typically it is a person who needs to control others, or wants to be controlled by others. This page will eventually try to answer the question from a psychological perspective.
Shortly after this page was written, a neighbor I've only known a few months parked a white van between his house and where I live. This gives an opportunity to analyze some 'white van psychology', since I know the context.
When I first met him I was carrying something heavy and did not feel like stopping and chatting. I was not trying to be rude, I was carrying something heavy.
The next morning there were some dog droppings that were laid in front of my mailbox.
The message seemed to be 'Pretend to be friendly or pay the price', a common sort of 'neighbor relationship' in melting pots.
A few weeks after the dog droppings, he called and said he wanted to plant flowers around my mailbox if I didn't object. I said 'fine'. He planted flashy flowers and put a set of antlers on the ground in between the flowers. It's not something a person like him would do, which is the first clue.
Then, a few weeks later, I made a comment that he took offense at and the white van was parked between the houses shortly after that.
White van people have a few things in common, which overlap with the perceived authority many 'law enforcers' feel they have, and which explains why law enforcers frequently use white vans as a way to project their imaginary authority using the resources provided for them to work.
This 'white van' personality starts with overt physical control, harassment, intimidation etc as necessary to an individual's identity. Something in their background, their upbringing, conditioned them to relate in a transactional way. Others are given a choice, "Comply with my/our will, or be punished".
https://nypost.com/2021/10/07/ex-nypd-sergeants-union-boss-ed-mullins-files-for-retirement/
The NYPD union boss personifies that well enough. Some people would say he was spanked too much as a child, others would say not enough.
Then it evolves into more of a group thing, personified by the federal agents who arrested him, and who like bombastic white vans rather than bombastic rhetoric.
One further interesting aspect of the 'white police rape van' psychology is the feminine element in it.
Typically white vans are used, in popular culture, by either 'serial killer' types or by police. But police who use white vans have a specific type of relationship with female authority figures.
The neighbor on the other side is a very decent person. He stopped by once and, like the neighbor who asked if he could plant flowers around the mailbox, offered something unusual in a way that does not fit his personality, and clearly originated with a woman.
Both of those neighbors have big signs on their lawns saying something like "We like black people", and neither of the men is one to put up a sign like that, except under duress.
The antlers on the ground near the newly flowered mail box are a feminine touch that reeks of a woman who spent a lot of time reading Aleister Crowley as an adolescent, then 'matured' to pop psych.
Very nice people, great neighbors, but hopefully I will get the means to move on soon.
Gabby Petito seems to have bought a white van for psychological reasons related to the confusing transactional relationships which some abused people feel they need. It may be related to the 'false wilderness' discussed on another page.
https://nypost.com/2021/09/24/gabby-petito-tragedy-shines-light-on-van-lifes-dark-side/
~
Here is a video about the origin of the 'white van' aura.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66FezvTmreI
Going back to at least the 1970s white vans were used by serial killers in Texas to abduct boys
https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/the-lost-boys/
and girls.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/the-eleven-on-the-trail-of-a-serial-killer/
~
"There are certain things that set off a red flag in the back of your mind, such as a white van without windows. Why shouldn’t it, after all? Isn’t this the trademark of pedophiles and murderers everywhere?"
https://www.ihorror.com/gacymobile/
The vast majority of white police rape vans, whether used by police, or private serial killers / rapists, do have windows of course.
~
Natascha Kampush, Jayce Dugard and many other child abduction victims were kidnapped by predators who used white vans.
Serial killers Dean Corll, Arthur Ream, Bradley Robert Edwards, Charles Gary Sullivan, Ted Bundy, Gary Michael Hilton and many others used a white van while abducting victims. The 'Grim Sleeper' used a white van with blue trim. The 'Zebra murders' were committed by a group of four serial killers in a white van.
Even in other countries white vans are the vehicle of choice for those in that profession. Levi Bellfield and Robert Black lured victims into their white vans in Britain.
What is the psychology behind a person's use of a white van?
Years ago police started using white vans for projects like surveillance.
White vans are ubiquitous, many businesses use them, so years ago they were a way for cops to watch people discreetly.
Most police know that white vans are often used by their colleagues, so they may hesitate to pull over a speeding white van. Less experienced cops may not know that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qD9mAWhlL5M
Some police manuals from the 1970s explicitly say that white vans should be used for surveillance projects because they are fairly common. Reference to that fact has been made in books written by cops involved in corruption, and any cop from that era who was aware of crooked cops, Frank Serpico, Robert Leuci, or any other of the many that have gone public will tell that to any person who asks.
White vans are commonly associated with police, including 'rogue' cops, but on Google they show up associated with crime too.
If you search "white van" on Google, one of the top suggested completions is "white van kidnapping", but most people over 30 know that white vans are associated with police.
Google appears to have deliberately removed search completions connecting police and white vans from its search engine.
https://www.businessinsider.com/google-manipulates-search-results-report-2019-11
Today many people are aware that police use white vans, so they are not as commonly used for real 'criminal' surveillance.
Instead they are often used to harass people and, as the name suggests, sometimes individual police officers use them to commit rapes and other crimes.
Anybody can watch videos of the recent protests in the U.S. and count the unusual number of white vans around the protests. Go to Youtube and search for protest videos that show traffic around the protest, count the white vans as a percentage of traffic, then do the same for non protest scenes.
The protestors know who are in the vans, and they know the purpose is intimidation, harassment. The police are basically hiding behind legitimate users of service vans, e.g. delivery vehicles etc, the same way a gunman might hide behind children. Occasionally there are references to this, for example real service van drivers complaining about police 'hiding' behind them.
As discussed elsewhere, policing is not an archetypal occupation.
It is not a healthy function in society to have 1,000,000 people, e.g. in the United States, whose job is to control people under guise of 'we are protecting you'. The vast majority of police in the U.S. will never have real cause to draw their gun, much less shoot it. There simply are not enough real criminals for them to live out their fantasy. So trying to coax people into violence is one strategy for creating criminals which will let the police play 'pretend hero'. That kind of strategy always backfires of course, and police are starting to pay a price for strategies like that.
Notice the reference to the white van by the ex cop in the following video, at about the 10 minute point. 'A human sized oven, a house in the middle of nowhere and a white van'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsmaIUFSQC0
That individual became a cop for the same reason most cops become cops, he liked the feeling of power.
The only thing that distinguished him from most cops is that he did not fit in with them. Most cops who have had that job more than a week know that his sense of humor is common among cops, and he would have been safe in his job if he had actually followed through on some of what he was pretending i.e., if he proved to other cops that his sense of humor was based on real perversions rather than trying to fit in.
A cop cannot say "The job makes me feel powerful". He or she has to say something like "I like helping people", then they have to discreetly prove to their colleagues that they are predators pretending to have decent motives, like most of their colleagues. There are countless real 'help somebody' jobs. If somebody wants to help people they do not become a cop. Nobody has ever become a cop because they want to help people, but the necessity to pretend that motive is so important that most cops are promoted or fired almost entirely on their ability to pretend that motive. In many cases the group mystique is so strong that they believe their motives are 'selfless'.
Motives are easily hidden when a person joins a gang, and the vast majority of cops do not understand their own motives.
Although that ex cop's claimed 'fetishes' are quite a bit different than the average person's, policing encourages and rewards people who really do have motives like that.
Almost all of the 'chat' quotes cited on that video are obviously meant as jokes, a group of guys seeing who can pee furthest, they are also no different than the jokes anybody involved in most other unnatural melting pot occupations are drawn to.
In that case, notice that the white rape van is the only real world connection between that individual and his 'fetish'. He lists three things that 'did not exist', but one of those things, the 'white rape van', was his tenuous connection to his real world power, and it was real, even if not a specific part of his policing job.
Every police officer has their 'white van', their symbol of unnatural power which disconnects them from non police.
Here are some more examples from the public realm
Netflix heavily uses footage of white vans in its crime documentaries and certain other categories of its films. In some of its documentaries the majority of vehicles it portrays prominently are white police rape vans. In some cases it uses the exact same footage in several documentaries on completely different subjects. The footage in the Netflix series 'Rotten' series one, episode six, about the fishing industry, uses a clip of a white van at 21 minutes 38 seconds that they also use in crime documentaries.
Another interesting example is the NetFlix documentary on Nigeria "Journey of an African Colony". The entire series uses white police rape vans in an unusual way, an interesting example which seems to sum up the use is at Season 1, episode 3 starting at about 33 minutes 50 seconds.
Watching that same scene a little longer it leads to a discussion of a Nigeria which has separate 'towns' of white and indigenous people, then an interview by a black male host with a British female. Conquest initially involved eliminating a local population to get its land. Today though, at least for the moment, there are no easy ways to utterly depopulate an area for conquest. A fair guess is that these 'white van scenes' are a propagandist's attempt to psychologically push society toward melting pot outposts in colonized areas. A person curious to research it might try to find out if NetFlix documentaries are available in other countries. NetFlix almost certainly has received some sort of British or U.S. funding, or other consideration, and its likely part of that would be invested in pushing their films in other countries.
These scenes are so common in NetFlix movies that they are clearly deliberate, and they appear to be promoting some sort of support for the broader colonial views which underlie the colonial Western worldview, but it is still a mystery why exactly Netflix does this. Is NetFlix working for some country or organization to produce 21st century propaganda which slides under the conscious perception of most viewers? Seems unlikely but governments have a history of similar programs.
https://www.cato.org/commentary/how-national-security-state-manipulates-news-media
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_influence_on_public_opinion
Those examples mostly involve the U.S. and the CIA, but many other countries have done, and still do, similar manipulative operations. NetFlix is a U.S. corporation, so if they are being used as a propaganda outlet then it would be a U.S. / British project, anybody living in a different place should be able to find examples in their own country.
1) Netflix has a series called 'Filthy Rich, Jeffrey Epstein.'
https://www.netflix.com/title/80224905
The series looks like a clever propaganda piece. It gives no new information, but tries to present itself as an expose of sorts. Some time in the future that series will be shown in colleges as an example of a type of 21st century propaganda used to sanitize events which reflect poorly on powerful officials. One of the warning signs in this type of propaganda is the white police rape van. Watch episode two in particular and pay attention to when and where 'the white police rape van' appears.
The purpose of the series is to shift responsibility for flaws in the Epstein case which resulted from corruption, and to minimize the risk of additional loose ends in the official narrative. Notice the scene at 26:30 in episode 4, of a white garbage truck driving between the viewers and the U.S. capitol building. Like the amateur German propaganda of WWII, which was cutting edge in the 1930s and 1940s, this Netflix series will be dissected eventually by propaganda students. It is inconceivable that the film was not made with some U.S. government funds.
In this series, the 'government' i.e., people in positions of power, are very subtly 'let off the hook' using symbolism in a way that most people won't notice, then the white van is presented as a power symbol of 'law enforcement' slightly under the conscious perception of many viewers.
Doing this in a series about Epstein is brazen, but probably effective.
2) The Keepers, Netflix, season 1, episode 1
43:20 The former Baltimore detective is in his vehicle. The woman is trying to get more info about a police coverup involving a young woman's murder.
43:25 A white fleetpro service van pulls up on the other side of the detective's car.
43:45 Somebody gets out of the white service van.
44:24 The white van is gone.
45:01 The van is back again.
Aside from sloppy editing by Netflix, the detective had stopped in a place outside of traffic, so the chances of a white van appearing, and needing to park right there, yet again, in yet another Netflix documentary about people challenging police abuse, does not look coincidental.
Is Fleetpro the kind of company that would lend itself to plastic wannabe 'law enforcers' who spend their time surveilling due to their lack of any skills aside from driving?
The number two 'qualification' listed by the founder and president Thomas Farcosky on his bio is "Vietnam 1967-1969". You can imagine him pretending the Vietcong are there in the DC area and he is ready to protect his country.
https://www.fleetpro.com/management/
One of his receptionists left the following review on a job review site.
"When I woke up! I go turn on my reception desk with 3 compuetrs! I load all programs I am needing! After i open receptionist log to fill it! I provide any kind information to other departments like bridge, restaraunt, engine as well as i provide information to people who needs a support I am solving their problems by contacting techinicians department + give them information what they want! It is my whole day job! I was an officer with 2 stars and leader of muster station! I directed my crew 12 people how they should act during drills!"
Two stars? A muster station? Drills? Yes sir, we have white vans you can use. The U.S. will eventually be safe from the Vietcong.
https://www.indeed.com/cmp/Fleetpro/reviews?fcountry=ALL
Most, or perhaps all, Netflix documentaries which involve police corruption feature white police rape vans prominently.
Season 1, episode 3 of the same series. What is the first vehicle that episode shows?
There are groups which help people in extreme situations. The police are not one of those groups, even though that is the specific thing they are paid to do. Policing is built around taking away peoples' abilities to defend themselves, then stepping in and pretending to save them.
There is no doubt that Netflix would try to portray their decision to put white police rape vans throughout their 'crooked cop' documentaries as something that has some noble goal. But the original motive of whoever ultimately pushed Netflix in that direction is simply to empower police at the expense of their victims and the general public.
There are more indications that Netflix's goal is to hinder the investigation of crooked cops and sabotage those who are a potential threat to those corrupt cops. Notice in The Keepers documentary season 1, episode 4, at 5 minutes 12 seconds.
3) Netflix 'Conversation With a Killer, The Ted Bundy Tapes
Season 1, episode 2 at about the 1 minute mark mentions women hitch hiking, then shows two women getting in a white police style rape van.
Whoever runs Netflix is obviously using the white police rape van across all 'cop/criminal' documentaries for reasons having to do with the public perception of that type vehicle.
An interesting thing about Ted Bundy is that although he was never a police officer, he is the type of personality attracted to that job and probably would have become a successful police officer at some point. One of the ways he abducted women was to identify himself as a police officer and at try to handcuff the woman. He drove a VW Bug, but probably would have driven a white van if he though it would be less conspicuous. His crimes occurred just as police were beginning to use white vans but they were not yet common.
Oh, no
Shortly after writing the last paragraph, I watched season1, episode 4.
At 39 minutes on that episode Ted Bundy is now using a white van.
4) Netflix 'Natascha Kampusch, The Whole Story' is about a Viennese girl abducted on her way to school, and held for ten years
Abducted by a person in a white van. That was Austria, 1998, a time when Europe was being heavily indoctrinated with U.S. and British symbols. A person could wonder if the kidnapper was 'trying to be a cop'.
5) Of course
"The men then took Schanda Handley to the garage and forced her inside the back of a white van."
https://www.theadvocate.com/acadiana/news/courts/article_60834c7a-ecbc-11eb-b075-2378ae957baa.html
6)
~
The people behind these projects undoubtedly believe they are doing good, or helping 'their' people, and it's possible that in the very short term these deceptions may give a little land or power which they might not have gotten otherwise, but the net effect is simply an increase in some future violence against that broader society which got the short term gains. If the colonizing powers could be sure of utterly eliminating, exterminating, indigenous populations with this targeted propaganda then it might be a sensible strategic move in strictly ethnic terms, but then another problem arises. The British, and their derivative societies like the U.S. and Australia, are no longer the growing edge of the melting pot. China is taking over that function, and eventually indigenous Americans will replace China. So all that these efforts are ultimately doing is paving the way for a more rapid strengthening of China against weakened tribal entities, at the same time that Britain derived societies lose strategic power.
Watching the "Journey of an African Colony" documentary referenced above leads the mild 'NetFlix conspiracy' into a broader effort. Notice the references in that documentary to 'Nigerian amalgamation', then Google the phrase "amalgamation Nigeria".
Amalgamation is an English word with an interesting history, and its use in this colonial context has been, and is, clearly being promoted for psychological reasons. Amalgamation is a specific type of mixture which has many historical subtexts in the English language. When gold miners have some sort of crude mix of materials that contain tiny amounts of gold which are hard to retrieve, they add mercury to the mix. Mercury amalgamates with only a few substances, including gold. So putting mercury into the dirty mix will create a new mixture which appears homogenous, and allows the recovery of the gold from the dirty mix. Once the amalgam is taken from the dirty mix, it is placed over a fire and the mercury burns off, leaving the gold.
Using the word 'amalgamation' gives English speakers who also have knowledge of history and chemistry a way to use the English language to control conversations involving that word, a very powerful factor if those English language conversations are between colonizers and colonized.
In Progress
https://abc13.com/teen-kidnapped-rape-sexual-assault-kidnapping/10501467/
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/weekly/morgue/cover/1996_Jan_17.RAPE.html
https://www.dailyuw.com/news/article_e1472358-60d6-11eb-9ab4-cb0812c9ccbc.html
https://www.kare11.com/article/news/crime/police-search-for-van-related-to-rape-case/89-274177007
Fernando Velazco Cota
Benjamin Ritchie
Buford Furrow
Caruthers Alexander
Shahidul Ahmed
William Horncy
Roy Lee Pippin
James Franklin Rose
Timothy Stuart Ring
Jason Scott Byram
Larry Jenkins
Michelle Kehoe
Mitchell Scott Johnson
Nordine Amrani
Gary Chad Thomason
Daniel Lugo
Jeffrey Johnson
Richard Boggs
Jerry Scott Heidler
Thomas Hamilton
Edwin Debrow
John Linley Frazier
In Progress
Page 12 of 76
"It is better to have less thunder in the mouth and more lightning in the hand."
~ Apache